152 Carlton Street
PO Box 92545
After a 6 year investigation the CHRC could not find SINGLE
word I have written which violates Section 13.
Over the past few months my reputation
has been under constant assault by those seeking to uphold Section 13 of
the Canadian Human Rights Act and censorship.
Their game is to try to destroy me and my reputation in hopes
I’ll just fade away and their precious censorship law can be used to
muzzle others like
The more I expose the CHRC
and their dirty tricks, the more defamatory comments are directed
It’s understandable why the mainstream media wants to do it. They want a good guy / bad guy dichotomy. To describe me as what I am – a guy who served his country as a Canadian Forces medic, and now certified computer expert who ran a website critical of immigration and the CHRC, wouldn’t sell that many papers. Instead the media wants to build me into some I am not and never have been. To them I guess it’s all about the almighty dollar. Trashing the reputation of little people who do not have armies of lawyers at the ready. They act just like the CHRC, attacking those that don’t have the ability to fight back, with the exception the National Post hasn’t planted evidence on my website to later drag me through a 5 year legal battle.
As the Canadian Human Rights Commission has learned, I am not one to simply roll over and be stream rolled by their goddamn bulldozer of repression. I will fight back and I will WIN. One at a time I have brought out the most amazing and startling evidence. From the complainant in my case – Richard Warman and shocking internet postings to CHRC operatives trying to set me up while my case was before the Tribunal. While others in the media and Blogosphere want to take my professional research and run with it as though it was theirs without ever giving me any credit.
Barbara Kulaszka and myself are the one's who spent countless hours reviewing every single Section 13 case and thousands of lines of website log code to expose these bastards, yet no one would know as they take my research and spread it around as tho it was theirs.
Just read Mark Steyn in Macleans this week. He talks all about my case, yet never once mentions it is all *MY* research that is bringing the CHRC down, or even that it's my case to be heard on March 25th.
It’s a sick game they are playing. Back in 2003 I was targeted because I had the only websites in all of Canada to document and expose Richard Warman AND the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Unlike many who smell I might just win and jumped on the bandwagon, I was against the CHRC, long before I ever became a victim of their dirty tricks.
It's a strange situation this whole case. From the beginning I tried numerous times to mediate the case. I hired my lawyer - Barbara Kulaszka - with the idea that she would only have to write a couple of letters for me to mediate the dispute. 5 years later I feel somewhat stupid for ever being so blind as to believe it would have just went away. BEFORE I ever received the complaint by Richard Warman, I had shut the message board down and was about the shut down the website too. At the time even Richard Warman wrote in a B'nai Brith article that "Lemire’s now largely moribund website www.freedomsite.org and its forum".
I never believed so many went undercover to set me up in order to shut me down. I was incorrect to believe that taking my message board down and all the complained of posts would be the end of it. Silly me, I thought the legislation was only remedial in nature, as the act itself says. But the CHRC wanted to punish me instead, and now after 5 years of litigation, I am starting to think that the CHRC wished they took the deal I was offering. (which was for me to promise not to bring back the message board, and they leave me alone)
Of course the answer is no, but the best response I can ever give is that after being under the microscope of the CHRC (and even the police thanks to Richard Warman) for at least 6 years, they have YET TO FIND A SINGLE WORD I HAVE WRITTEN THAT IS “HATE”. All they can claim is me posting articles from newspapers, House of Commons Hansard and even the human rights act itself as “Prima Facie” evidence that I somehow promote hate
Since I wasn’t a hater and never said anything which could even remotely violate the insane Section 13, the only way to get me was to target my website and especially the message board, which allowed visitors the ability to post their own comments. And that was the attack vector used to ensnare me. Close to 90% of the case against me, involves posting by unknown parties and/or someone named “Craig Harrison” whom I have never met and never even spoken a single word to.
In contrast, look at the complainant, Richard Warman. He has made many offensive posts, using pseudonyms such as Lucie, Pogue Mahone and AxetoGrind on the internet. He has even signed his posting with Heil Hitler, then has the nerve to call me some sort of Nazi in material filed with the Tribunal.
Its really like being in an episode of the Twilight Zone. I’m called a nazi when I have never posted a single thing that is supportive of Nazi’s or Adolf Hitler... yet the complainant, Richard Warman, who has signed his internet post with Heil Hitler, is the “anti-racism activist”
Unlike Richard Warman, I do not cruise
internet sites pretending to be a woman and using pseudonyms like “Pogue
I use my real name, my own image and my own address. That alone really speaks volumes about those “anti-racists” and the lengths they are willing to go to get their enemies.
If I was really some fireband neo-Nazi and White Supremacist, the Canadian Human Rights Commission wouldn't have had to set me up. And Joe Brean would have easily been able to quote tons of nasty things I was saying in the over 30 minute interview.
We have come to the point in Canada, where those proclaiming to be against “racism” are the ones who are the biggest promoters of it. They continually point the finger at everyone else, as tho it will give them a free pass to promote their hate. And people like Joe Brean and the National Post just freely play along with this rouse. (I pointed out to Brean all this material, yet he chose to not use it… wonder why?)
If I’m a neo-nazi for never once praising Adolf Hitler, what does that make Richard Warman, the serial plaintiff in almost every single Section 13 complaint since 2003, who has signed an internet post with Heil Hitler?
Am I the white supremacist, when I have never called Native Canadians “red skinned” “animals”, like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)
Am I the anti-semite, when I have never called the Edmonton Journal a “kike publication”, like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)
Am I the homophobic person, when I have never said the Nazis “excluded sexual deviants that are like a Cancer to our movement...", like Richard Warman did on Stormfront? (Using the alias POGUE MAHONE)
Am I the one
Am I am the
anti-semite, when I have never pointed internet surfers where to go to
download a copy of Adolf Hitlers “
Am I the anti-Indian when I have never said that Native Canadians were “retarded little chug(s)” , like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)
Am I the black-hating one when I have never said that Blacks were “nogs” who “predominantly kuill each other”, like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)
Am I the anti-Semite, when I have never said “brothers that are being screwed by zog hate cops” (ZOG = Zionist Occupied Government) like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)
George Orwell had it right. “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
and Unfair | TRUTH is NO Defence | 100% Convictions | Lifetime Speech bans
... HANDS OFF THE INTERNET!
the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission become Communists?
Support Marc Lemire's Constitutional Challenge
Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law
and protect Freedom of Speech in