www.freedomsite.org | Online Store  



Contact us!


152 Carlton Street

PO Box 92545

Toronto, Ontario

M5A 2K1



E-mail Us



Canadian Association For Free Expression






Marc Lemire:  Not a Nazi or White Supremacist


After a 6 year investigation the CHRC could not find SINGLE

word I have written which violates Section 13.

Over the past few months my reputation has been under constant assault by those seeking to uphold Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and censorship.  Their game is to try to destroy me and my reputation in hopes I’ll just fade away and their precious censorship law can be used to muzzle others like Macleans Magazine, Catholic Insight and the Christian Heritage Party (just to name a few…).


The more I expose the CHRC and their dirty tricks, the more defamatory comments are directed towards me.  Most of the time by un-named organized internet smear artists, at others times by political spin ‘sellas (who post fake pictures of me), and now sadly by Canada’s National Post newspaper.  The article written by Joe Brean, who called me last Thursday and interviewed me for over 30 minutes, wrote that I am “one of Canada's most prominent white supremacist propagandists” and a “prominent distributor of white supremacist propaganda.”  These are both outright lies.  And true to the National Posts style, no fact checker ever called and I was never given any opportunity to respond to allegations.  [see update below also]

It’s understandable why the mainstream media wants to do it.  They want a good guy / bad guy dichotomy. To describe me as what I am – a guy who served his country as a Canadian Forces medic, and now certified computer expert who ran a website critical of  immigration and the CHRC, wouldn’t sell that many papers.  Instead the media wants to build me into some I am not and never have been. To them I guess it’s all about the almighty dollar. Trashing the reputation of little people who do not have armies of lawyers at the ready.  They act just  like the CHRC, attacking those that don’t have the ability to fight back, with the exception the National Post hasn’t planted evidence on my website to later drag me through a 5 year legal battle.


As the Canadian Human Rights Commission has learned, I am not one to simply roll over and be stream rolled by their goddamn bulldozer of repression.  I will fight back and I will WIN.  One at a time I have brought out the most amazing and startling evidence.  From the complainant in my case – Richard Warman and shocking internet postings to CHRC operatives trying to set me up while my case was before the Tribunal.  While others in the media and Blogosphere want to take my professional research and run with it as though it was theirs without ever giving me any credit.


Barbara Kulaszka and myself are the one's who spent countless hours reviewing every single Section 13 case and thousands of lines of website log code to expose these bastards, yet no one would know as they take my research and spread it around as tho it was theirs.


Just read Mark Steyn in Macleans this week.  He talks all about my case, yet never once mentions it is all *MY* research that is bringing the CHRC down, or even that it's my case to be heard on March 25th.


It’s a sick game they are playing. Back in 2003 I was targeted because I had the only websites in all of Canada to document and expose Richard Warman AND the Canadian Human Rights Commission.  Unlike many who smell I might just win and jumped on the bandwagon, I was against the CHRC, long before I ever became a victim of their dirty tricks.


It's a strange situation this whole case.  From the beginning I tried numerous times to mediate the case.  I hired my lawyer - Barbara Kulaszka - with the idea that she would only have to write a couple of letters for me to mediate the dispute.  5 years later I feel somewhat stupid for ever being so blind as to believe it would have just went away. BEFORE I ever received the complaint by Richard Warman, I had shut the message board down and was about the shut down the website too.  At the time even Richard Warman wrote in a B'nai Brith article that "Lemire’s now largely moribund website www.freedomsite.org and its forum".  


I never believed so many went undercover to set me up in order to shut me down.  I was incorrect to believe that taking my message board down and all the complained of posts would  be the end of it.  Silly me, I thought the legislation was only remedial in nature, as the act itself says. But the CHRC wanted to punish me instead, and now after 5 years of litigation, I am starting to think that the CHRC wished they took the deal I was offering.  (which was for me to promise not to bring back the message board, and they leave me alone)



Is Marc Lemire a “white supremacist” / “Neo-Nazi”?


Of course the answer is no,  but the best response I can ever give is that after being under the microscope of the CHRC (and even the police thanks to Richard Warman) for at least 6 years, they have YET TO FIND A SINGLE WORD I HAVE WRITTEN THAT IS “HATE”.  All they can claim is me posting articles from newspapers, House of Commons Hansard and even the human rights act itself as “Prima Facie” evidence that I somehow promote hate


Since I wasn’t a hater and never said anything which could even remotely violate the insane Section 13, the only way to get me was to target my website and especially the message board, which allowed visitors the ability to post their own comments. And that was the attack vector used to ensnare me.  Close to 90% of the case against me, involves posting by unknown parties and/or someone named “Craig Harrison” whom I have never met and never even spoken a single word to.


In contrast, look at the complainant, Richard Warman.  He has made many offensive posts, using pseudonyms such as Lucie, Pogue Mahone and AxetoGrind on the internet.  He has even signed his posting with Heil Hitler, then has the nerve to call me some sort of Nazi in material filed with the Tribunal.


Its really like being in an episode of the Twilight Zone.  I’m called a nazi when I have never posted a single thing that is supportive of Nazi’s or Adolf Hitler... yet the complainant, Richard Warman, who has signed his internet post with Heil Hitler, is the “anti-racism activist”


Unlike Richard Warman, I do not cruise internet sites pretending to be a woman and using pseudonyms like “Pogue Mahone,  “Lucie,” “Axetogrind,” and “ Mary Dufford”.  and unlike CHRC investigators who call themselves “Jadewarr” or Edmonton Police Hate Crimes unit officers who call themselves “Estate” who posted the most vilest of racist material online. Or ARA communists like Shane Ruttle Martinez who troll as "Markw14" and also steal women's pictures (Martinez purloined a real woman's attractive pics, pretended to be a sexy, White nationalist "Rachel" and came on to Mr. Beck)


I use my real name, my own image and my own address.  That alone really speaks volumes about those “anti-racists” and the lengths they are willing to go to get their enemies.


If I was really some fireband neo-Nazi and White Supremacist, the Canadian Human Rights Commission wouldn't have had to set me up.  And Joe Brean would have easily been able to quote tons of nasty things I was saying in the over 30 minute interview.


We have come to the point in Canada, where those proclaiming to be against “racism” are the ones who are the biggest promoters of it.  They continually point the finger at everyone else, as tho it will give them a free pass to promote their hate. And people like Joe Brean and the National Post just freely play along with this rouse.  (I pointed out to Brean all this material, yet he chose to not use it… wonder why?)


If I’m a neo-nazi for never once praising Adolf Hitler, what does that make Richard Warman, the serial plaintiff in almost every single Section 13 complaint since 2003, who has signed an internet post with Heil Hitler?


Am I the white supremacist, when I have never called Native Canadians “red skinned” “animals”, like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)


Am I the anti-semite, when I have never called the Edmonton Journal a “kike publication”, like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)


Am I the homophobic person, when I have never said the Nazis “excluded sexual deviants that are like a Cancer to our movement...", like Richard Warman did on Stormfront? (Using the alias POGUE MAHONE)


Am I the one against M ulticulturalism, when I have never said “Our corrupt government is nothing but a puppet to this so called multicultural agenda”, like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)


Am I am the anti-semite, when I have never pointed internet surfers where to go to download a copy of Adolf Hitlers “ Mein Kampf” and nazi songs by “DJ Adolf” from, like Richard Warman did on Stormfront?  (Using the alias POGUE MAHONE


Am I the anti-Indian when I have never said that Native Canadians were “retarded little chug(s)” , like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)


Am I the Neo-Nazi when I have never praised hardcore US Nazi leader “Commander Schoep” of the National Socialist M ovement, like Richard Warman did? (Using the alias AxetoGrind)


Am I the black-hating one when I have never said that Blacks were “nogs” who “predominantly kuill each other”, like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)


Am I the anti-Semite, when I have never said “brothers that are being screwed by zog hate cops” (ZOG = Zionist Occupied Government) like Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police did? (Using the alias ESTATE)



George Orwell had it right.  During times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.



Written by Marc Lemire.  

(Not “lucie”, “Pogue Mahone,” “ Markw14,” “Estate” “Jadewarr,” “Axetogrind,” “ Mary Dufford,” “Dave McLean,” "Rachael," “90sAREover,” “Robert Simpson,” etc)


Marc Lemire is a former Canadian Forces Medic and Toronto area computer expert who runs the Freedomsite (http://www.freedomsite.org) and was charged by the CHRC in 2003 for alleged violations of Section 13 by mostly unknown parties on an internet message board he ran in 2003. As part of his defence, M r. Lemire is undertaking the most serious constitutional challenge the Canadian Human Rights Act have ever undergone. To date there has been 25 hearing days, and Mr. Lemire has called world-renown expert witnesses to challenge every aspect of Internet censorship by the CHRC.




Update - March 23, 2008


On March 23/08, I emailed the Joe Brean and asked him: 


Brean,   Got a problem with me posting:


  • Referring to your comments on me as “lies
  • Saying you are “like a retard, with a bag of marbles in his mouth, stuttering so much I could hardly even understand his questions”  [I did actually remove this even tho Joe Brean had no issue with it]
  • people like Joe Brean and the National Post just freely play along with this rouse.  (I pointed out to Brean all this material, yet he chose to not use it… wonder why?)”

?  Let me know, as I will post your comments on my website.  Of course you never gave me this opportunity, but I will do it for you, to give you the opportunity to respond with equal prominence as the original article I posted on my website.


His response on March 23, 2008 @ 11:04am was:


I have no objections. I did include the following quote, but that was cut from the story, I think due to space constraints on the front page. That was out of my control.

 "They went after me. Two commission employees tried to set me up," said Mr. Lemire, who is charged with violating the Human Rights Act because of comments posted on his FreedomSite. "I'm really the victim of this whole thing. I never wanted to be in this position... I'm interested in seeing the reign of censorship of the Commission ended, and it's unfortunate that it's been put on my shoulders to do."





Biased and Unfair | TRUTH is NO Defence | 100% Convictions | Lifetime Speech bans






Have the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission become Communists?



The Canadian Human Rights Commission

The Communists targeted one race

The CHRC targets only working-class Whites, whose beliefs they disagree with


The Communists used unfair courts and tribunals while limiting any possible defence


Not a single person has ever won a case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (over 40 cases…)

The Communists targeted the poor

98% of victims the CHRC attacks are poor. 90.7% of victims are so poor they are not able to even hire a lawyer to represent them.


The Communists used all means at their disposal to silence their opponents.

The CHRC shall “…try by persuasion, publicity or any other means that it considers appropriate to discourage and reduce discriminatory practices…”

Section 27(h) - Canadian Human Rights Act


The Communists used the NKVD to attack political opponents

The CHRC has benefited from the Police raiding people’s homes for alleged “hate”.  No criminal charges come but the CHRC uses the seized material against victims


The Communists would get people fired from their employment over their beliefs


A recent victim of the CHRC (Terry Tremaine) was fired from his position at the University of Sask. for his political beliefs.

The Communists used street thugs to attack their enemies

Paul Fromm, Canada ’s largest defender of CHRC victims, had his house attacked by a crazed mob of radicals and is constantly physically attacked



Stephen Harper (Conservative Party Leader, current Prime M inister):


"Human Rights Commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society…It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this is very scary stuff."

(BC Report Newsmagazine, January 11, 1999)

For more than twenty years, in this column and

elsewhere, I have been writing against the human rights commissions, which have quasi-legal powers that should be offensive to the citizens of any free country. They are kangaroo courts, in which the defendant's right to due process is withdrawn. They reach judgements on the basis of no fixed law. M oreover, “the process is the punishment” in these star chambers -- for simply by agreeing to hear a case, they tie up the defendant in bureaucracy and paperwork, and bleed him for the cost of lawyers, while the person who brings the complaint, however frivolous, stands to lose nothing.

Ottawa Citizen - December 9, 2007


Human rights commissions are obsolete bodies whose moment has passed. That they can be exploited by a narrow lobby seeking to impose its doctrine upon other Canadians is a serious problem.

Calgary Herald - December 19, 2007


there is plenty of prima facie evidence to suggest the "human rights" racket is systemically corrupt. I will cite only the most obvious example: In the three decades of its existence, no defendant dragged before the Canadian Human Rights Commission under a Section XIII complaint has ever been acquitted. A "court" that only reaches the same verdict is not the most reassuring example of justice's blindness.

M ark Steyn – January 2, 2008


http://www.freedomsite.org | http://www.CanadianFreeSpeech.com









Support Marc Lemire's Constitutional Challenge


Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law 

and protect Freedom of Speech in Canada !


  • Via Mail: Send Cheque or Money Order to:

Marc Lemire

152 Carlton Street 

PO Box 92545 

Toronto, Ontario 

M5A 2K1 









The Freedom-Site has been constantly online since 1996

Your Donations = Our Survival
152 Carlton Street,
PO Box 92545,
Toronto, Ontario,
M5A 2K1
Please send what you can to help keep our website operational


  Latest Updates

In Defence of Freedom


48 pages - $10


[more info...]




Books won't stay banned. They won't burn. Ideas won't go to jail. In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas.

 -- Alfred Whitney Griswold

Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself.

-- Potter Stewart