152 Carlton Street
PO Box 92545
Did Richard Warman’s internet postings contribute to further hate?
A study of some of the responses to Warman's posts
“There was no evidence of that having transpired whatsoever”
Warman’s posts included “kissing jew boots” others refer to a
Federal Court judge as “faggoty,” who “executes the orders of the
Jews” and a “sack of shit”
In a ruling by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on March 14, 2009, Tribunal member Edward Lustig, suggested that Mr. Warman’s internet postings using pseudonyms as “Axetogrind” and “Pogue Mahone.” – “could have precipitated further hate messages in response.” (See Para 63 of ruling). Lustig went on to characterize Warman’s participation on racial websites as “disappointing and disturbing”.
In an interview with Don Butler, published in the Calgary Herald on March 15, 2009, Warman, is quoted as saying that his posts do not precipitate hate and that was “pure supposition. There was no evidence of that having transpired whatsoever.”
So, whose right? Was it the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal member Edward Lustig, or is it Richard Warman? Do Richard Warman’s postings on the Internet precipitate further hate messages in response?
evidence … whatsoever”?
Here are just a few of Richard Warman’s posts, and the replies. You decide if Warman’s postings “could have precipitated further hate messages in response.”
So, did Richard Warman’s postings “precipitated further hate messages in response.”
Fight for Freedom Continues
the fanatics at the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission and
defending freedom of speech for ALL Canadians is not an easy task. In
particular, the final submissions which we've just finished consumed the
most time and resources. This has meant sacrificing a lot of cherished
things in my life that I used to take for granted such as spending
precious time with my children. It's also very costly and has incurred
heavy debts given that I'm facing a "Human Rights" juggernaut
that has a limitless budget. It has already spent millions and is prepared
to spent a lot more of your tax dollars to keep their thought control
My courageous lawyer Barbara Kulaszka and myself have demonstrated what two dedicated researchers can accomplish against overwhelming odds. We have single-handedly and doggedly fought the System and exposed the corrupt underbelly of the "Human Rights" Commission's fanatics. Nothing ever comes easy when you are fighting such a racket. This case is a seminal one, where the outcome will have serious implications on our right to think and speak freely in this country for generations to come. All Canadians will benefit if we manage to get this shameful law expunged from our legal books.
you can help:
Send your donation to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Send your donation to: email@example.com
Every single cent raises goes directly to this case and the legal defence fund.
Section 13 of the Canadian Human
Support Marc Lemire's Constitutional Challenge
Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law
and protect Freedom of Speech in