152 Carlton Street
PO Box 92545
CHRT RULING: Lemire Scores Monumental Victory over the CHRC - Spying Operations to be exposed!
Tribunal issues ruling that Internet Spy
Dean Steacy has to return to witness stand to answer questions on possible
Against the vigorous chest-beating of the Canadian
Human Rights Commission, Attorney General of Canada, Richard Warman and
the B’nai Brith Group (Canadian Jewish Congress and Simon Wiesenthal
1) The Respondent [Marc Lemire] may recall Hannya Rizk and Dean Steacy to testify before the
Tribunal, solely with respect to the questions to which the Commission had
made objections under s. 37 of the Canada Evidence Act, when these
witnesses first testified in 2007. … The hearing will resume for the
purposes of this evidence on
2) The Tribunal will now allow the issuance of the subpoena for Bell Canada that the Respondent had previously requested, but which the Tribunal had at that time denied given the then pending s. 37 objections of the Commission (see Warman v. Lemire, 2007 CHRT 21).
August 8, 2007 motion (just ruled on now)
1) With regard to the documents referred to in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4, the Respondent will be permitted to enter them as exhibits, at the March 25, 2008, hearing in Ottawa .
2. Documents disclosed by
the Commission on July 6,2007 as a result of testimony about them given by
access to Internet sites without going to a Tribunal.
3. Documents disclosed by the Commission on July 6,2007 pursuant to the
Commission's undertaking to search for correspondence between the Commission and ISP's that had been missed. [By the original CHRT ruling]
4. Pursuant to the
Commission's undertaking to do a further review of Harvey Goldberg's email
with respect to "hate", a number of documents were disclosed
under cover letter dated July 31, 2007 which the respondent wishes to rely
upon in the constitutional argument. These documents consist in the main
of emails to or from
Canadian Human Rights Commission Internet
Spying Apparatus Exposed!
Section 37 allows the government to conceal any
disclosure of information that they claim will injure security and hurt
the “operations of the Canadian Human Rights Commission” and reveal
it’s “investigation techniques.”
The only way to challenge a Section 37 invocation is for the victim
to appeal, within 10 days, to the Federal Court of Canada.
Against all odds .. that’s
The CHRC hoped that
First the CHRC went to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, and in lengthy motions, demanded the case against Lemire and the Constitutional Challenge not wait for the Federal Court and the Tribunal should order Final arguments BEFORE the Federal Court had ruled. This would make sure that whatever came out at Federal Court would not have been part of the Constitutional Challenge or the case being forwarded by Lemire.
The Tribunal would not go for that, and ruled that the case against Lemire would be stopped “Sine Die” until after the Federal Court of Canada ruled.
Then the CHRC tried to deplete all the resources and
The new plan was to give triple-hearsay
evidence in hopes of stopping the Federal Court appeal.
In December 2007, a letter came from CHRC counsel –
Undeterred by the CHRC’s political shell game, off
to the Federal Court of Canada the defence team went in January 2008.
At this point, the CHRC was so scared of losing the ability to ever
claim Section 37, they withdrew almost every objection they made under
Section 37. By withdrawing the
objections, the Federal Court of Canada no longer had any jurisdiction to
rule on the judicial review brought by
The day after the Federal
Court of Canada victory, it was made public that not only had 007 Dean
Steacy (licensed to CHILL) tried to entrap
Now, back to the Tribunal the defence team went. With defeat in the air, the entire gaggle of Section 13 enforcers had closed ranks and wanted to make sure Lemire was not allowed to recall the witnesses or bring forth any more evidence on the spying operations of the CHRC. During a conference call with all parties, the tribunal stuck it on Barbara Kulaszka to make a motion to reconvene the Tribunal hearing.
The Section 13 pre-crime enforcers were in near
hysterics to make sure no further evidence was submitted by the Lemire
defence team. The CHRC after
being smoked at the tribunal and at Federal Court on this issue .. were
doing their usual song-and-dance two-step.
Again the Lemire defence team was supposed to accept some obscene
triple-hearsay letter from
the Tribunal’s ruling of
Canadian “Human Rights” Commission senior investigator conducts spying operation against the Conservative Website FreeDominion.ca
The dark plot of the CHRC’s Agent Provocateur agenda Exposed!
of the story on FD here: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/jan18-08_FreeDominion_and_CHRC.html
Support Marc Lemire's Constitutional Challenge
Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law
and protect Freedom of Speech in