www.freedomsite.org | Online Store  

 

Contents



Contact us!

 

152 Carlton Street

PO Box 92545

Toronto, Ontario

M5A 2K1

Canada

 

E-mail Us

 

 


Canadian Association For Free Expression

 


 

 

 

 

Canadian “Human Rights” Commission called before the Federal Court of Canada to justify Spying Operations on Canadians

 

 

 

Where:      Federal Court of Canada

180 Queen Street W

                   Toronto , Ontario

 

When: January 15, 2008 – 9:30am

 

Case M arc Lemire Vs. Canadian Human Rights Commission

 

Who:  M edia Contact Paul Fromm: (905) 274-3868

 

Fireworks will fly on Tuesday when the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s spying operations are exposed in the Federal Court of Canada.  For the first time ever in history, the Canadian Human Rights Commission is being challenged by M arc Lemire for it’s spying operations, abuses of the law, deception and Agent Provocateur agenda on Internet message boards and websites.

 

Like some mobster in a U.S. trial who keep invoking the Fifth Amendment, the CHRC is trying to keep the veil of secrecy wrapped tight around its spying operations on Canadian Internet dissidents. It’s tool of choice is Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act. This allows government representatives the ability to prevent disclosure (hide) and claim “public interest” immunity over the disclosure of information that the CHRC alleges to be injurious to Canadian Government security and/or operations of a Federal agency.

 

During a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing in M ay, 2007, the CHRC invoked Section 37 numerous times during expert questioning by M arc Lemire’s legal counsel – Barbara Kulaszka . The questions are surrounding the link between Police Agencies and the CHRC, as well as the spying operations this federal government agency has been involved in. M arc Lemire has filed a constitutional challenge of the Canadian Human Rights Act, especially Section 13, the notorious internet censorship provision.

 

The evidence M arc Lemire is challenging before the Federal Court is explosive and will blow the whole agenda of the CHRC into the open. In a 300 page record, prepared by lead counsel Barbara Kulaszka , the abuse of Section 37 by the Commission was laid out in amazingly clear detail.  Those 300 pages decimate the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s claims and expose the spying operations of Canada ’s Thought Control apparatus

 

 

 

Issues at the Federal Court Review

 

CHRC using the account “Jadewarr” on the White Nationalist website www.Stormfront.org

The CHRC stopped all questioning of this infiltration account.  “Jadewarr” was used to engage M arc Lemire and others online. This is part of a larger scheme, with the Edmonton Police hate crimes unit posting outright discriminatory messages on Stormfront.org using the name “Estate”. Evidence before the Tribunal shows “Jadewarr” was a CHRC employee.  We want the name

 

The relationship between the CHRC and Police

The CHRC has been trying to elevate itself to a police agency.  They only have statue remedial powers, but through a series of police agreements they have access to highly secured police databases such as CPIC. As well M otor Vehicle records, phone records, police powers of search and seizure.  We want to know the extent of the relationship and how its been used

 

The CHRC silencing critics during the Same-Sex M arriage debate

In 2003-2004 the CHRC had filed 5-6 complaints against users on AOL Online, who were critical of homosexuality and opposed to same-sex marriage.  We want to know the names of the respondents and what effect the CHRC had in prosecuting only critics of same-sex marriage

 

The CHRC’s investigative techniques

Throughout the course of M arc Lemire’s hearing, it has become clear the CHRC has used shady tactics to go after those they don’t like.  This includes using tools to reveal the identity of online users, such as WHOIS and Visual Route We want to know how they used those tools and why

 

 

The Canadian Human Rights Commission is drunk with power and during 2007 has set it’s targets on both Internet critics and mainstream magazines. Currently M acleans M agazine and Catholic Insight magazine are under investigation as well the federally registered political party – The Christian Heritage Party.

 

M arc Lemire is a Toronto area computer expert who runs the Freedomsite (http://www.freedomsite.org) and was charged by the CHRC in 2003 for alleged violations of Section 13 by mostly unknown parties on an internet message board he ran in 2003. As part of his defence, M r. Lemire is undertaking the most serious constitutional challenge the Canadian Human Rights Act have ever undergone. To date there has been 25 hearing days, and M r. Lemire has called world-renown expert witnesses to challenge every aspect of Internet censorship by the CHRC. The Canadian Association for Free Expression has interested party status in both the Tribunal and before the Federal Court of Canada.

 

 

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

Active and Past cases: 46  |  Cases the tribunal ruled on: 37

 

·         NOT A SINGLE respondent have ever won a section 13 case

·         98% of cases have poor or working class respondents

·         90.7% of respondents are not represented by lawyers

·         $99,000 has been awarded in fines and special compensation since 2003.

·         35 respondents have lifetime speech bans (Cease and Desist) orders and if not followed the victims could face up to 5 years in prison.

 

 

Section 37 info at: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/june11-07_chrc_abuses_section_37.html

CHRC and the Canadian Police: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/Sept8-07_CHRC_and_Police.html

 

 

 

________________________________________________________________________

Biased and Unfair | TRUTH is NO Defence | 100% Convictions | Lifetime Speech bans

Censors ... HANDS OFF THE INTERNET!

http://www.freedomsite.org | http://www.CanadianFreeSpeech.com

 

 

 

 

 


Have the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission become Communists?

 

Communists

The Canadian Human Rights Commission

The Communists targeted one race

The CHRC targets only working-class Whites, whose beliefs they disagree with

 

The Communists used unfair courts and tribunals while limiting any possible defence

 

Not a single person has ever won a case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (over 40 cases…)

The Communists targeted the poor

98% of victims the CHRC attacks are poor. 90.7% of victims are so poor they are not able to even hire a lawyer to represent them.

 

The Communists used all means at their disposal to silence their opponents.

The CHRC shall “…try by persuasion, publicity or any other means that it considers appropriate to discourage and reduce discriminatory practices…”

Section 27(h) - Canadian Human Rights Act

 

The Communists used the NKVD to attack political opponents

The CHRC has benefited from the Police raiding people’s homes for alleged “hate”.  No criminal charges come but the CHRC uses the seized material against victims

 

The Communists would get people fired from their employment over their beliefs

 

A recent victim of the CHRC (Terry Tremaine) was fired from his position at the University of Sask. for his political beliefs.

The Communists used street thugs to attack their enemies

Paul Fromm, Canada ’s largest defender of CHRC victims, had his house attacked by a crazed mob of radicals and is constantly physically attacked

 

 

Stephen Harper (Conservative Party Leader, current Prime M inister):

 

"Human Rights Commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society…It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this is very scary stuff."

(BC Report Newsmagazine, January 11, 1999)

For more than twenty years, in this column and

elsewhere, I have been writing against the human rights commissions, which have quasi-legal powers that should be offensive to the citizens of any free country. They are kangaroo courts, in which the defendant's right to due process is withdrawn. They reach judgements on the basis of no fixed law. M oreover, “the process is the punishment” in these star chambers -- for simply by agreeing to hear a case, they tie up the defendant in bureaucracy and paperwork, and bleed him for the cost of lawyers, while the person who brings the complaint, however frivolous, stands to lose nothing.

Ottawa Citizen - December 9, 2007

 

Human rights commissions are obsolete bodies whose moment has passed. That they can be exploited by a narrow lobby seeking to impose its doctrine upon other Canadians is a serious problem.

Calgary Herald - December 19, 2007

 

there is plenty of prima facie evidence to suggest the "human rights" racket is systemically corrupt. I will cite only the most obvious example: In the three decades of its existence, no defendant dragged before the Canadian Human Rights Commission under a Section XIII complaint has ever been acquitted. A "court" that only reaches the same verdict is not the most reassuring example of justice's blindness.

M ark Steyn – January 2, 2008

 

http://www.freedomsite.org | http://www.CanadianFreeSpeech.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Support Marc Lemire's Constitutional Challenge

 

Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law 

and protect Freedom of Speech in Canada !

 

  • Via Mail: Send Cheque or Money Order to:

Marc Lemire

152 Carlton Street 

PO Box 92545 

Toronto, Ontario 

M5A 2K1 

Canada

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

The Freedom-Site has been constantly online since 1996

Your Donations = Our Survival
152 Carlton Street,
PO Box 92545,
Toronto, Ontario,
M5A 2K1
Please send what you can to help keep our website operational

 

  Latest Updates

In Defence of Freedom

 

48 pages - $10

 

[more info...]

 

 

 


Books won't stay banned. They won't burn. Ideas won't go to jail. In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas.

 -- Alfred Whitney Griswold


Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself.

-- Potter Stewart