152 Carlton Street
PO Box 92545
Are the Canadian Human Rights Commission/Tribunal a KANGAROO COURT?
the inception of the Canadian Human
Rights Commission and the Canadian
Human Rights Tribunal, it has been described by many as a
a glaring example, to date there has been 37 cases the Tribunal has ruled
on and not a single person EVER has been found innocent. Of those 37
cases, 100% of respondents have been White, 98% of cases have poor or
working class respondents and 90.7% of respondents are not represented by
lawyers . With the recent Beaumont Decision, where Bible quotes were
found to be hateful, a total of $93,000 has been awarded in fines
and special compensation since 2003. 35 respondents have lifetime speech
bans (Cease and Desist) orders and if not followed the victims could face
up to 5 years in prison.
on who you are, you either allowed to criticize the Canadian Human Rights
Commission, or they are going to deport you to
is a stark example. Ernst Zundel referred to the Canadian Human
Rights Tribunal as a hick tribunal and a kangaroo court. He
was denied any real due process of our law and shipped to
the other hand if you writing for the Ottawa Citizen newspaper and call
the CHRT a Kangaroo Court. No worries…..
Mr. Zündel described the CHRC as a Canadian "hick" (AND
KANGAROO) Tribunal, mentioning that it had no control over him when he was
living in the
added – Zundel
Security Certificate Decision
Warren in the Ottawa Citizen:
are kangaroo courts, in which the defendant's right to due process is
withdrawn. They reach judgements on the basis of no fixed law. Moreover,
“the process is the punishment” in these star chambers -- for simply
by agreeing to hear a case, they tie up the defendant in bureaucracy and
paperwork, and bleed him for the cost of lawyers, while the person who
brings the complaint, however frivolous, stands to lose nothing.
Canadians thoughts on the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal as a “Kangaroo
Tremaine – Victim of the CHRC.
According to the Commission's evidence, which was not challenged, Mr.
Fromm has made contemptuous comments directed at the Canadian judicial
system, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, members of the Tribunal and
towards the Commission. He has
described the Tribunal as "a Soviet style kangaroo court" and
its decisions as "Stalinist lunacy". He has also
stated that the Tribunal's decisions in hate speech cases are leading
is a kangaroo court? It's a tribunal where truth is no defence, where
opinion is on trial, where fines can be unlimited, where there is no trial
by jury, where the judge - called an adjudicator - is judge, jury and
prosecutor, where there is no right of appeal within the framework of the
Act, where normal rules of evidence don't exist, and where impressions
count for more than fact.
Late Doug Collins - Collins
Defies Human Rights Tribunal
people that have seen the Tribunal in action have referred to it as a
Kangaroo Court. They conduct Show Trials on behalf of the
Canadian "Human Rights" Tribunal has ruled:
is no defence
is no defence
comment is no defence
fact there are ZERO defences available
evidence is allowed (hearsay, double hearsay)
do not need to show any proof of actual harm of the messages complained of
Standard of proof is very low and is based on a “balance of
probabilities” not “beyond a reasonable doubt”
The Freedomsite: Tribunal
(non-profit Internet service dedicated to issues of
culture, life, and family. It was launched in September 1997)
HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS IN LIMBO AFTER BIAS CHALLENGE
human rights tribunals are notoriously biased in promoting homosexuality.
The commission has place homosexual activist lawyers as judges in many
cases. Provincial Human Rights Tribunals (increasingly identified by
critics as "kangaroo courts") in
time to abolish the Far-Left kangaroo courts, the Canadian "Human
Rights" Tribunal (and the Canadian "Human Rights"
Commission as well, and other Far-Left state apparatus nodes created by
the corrupt, crooked, Far-Left Liberal Party of Canada to appease Leftists
so they'd vote Liberal and not NDP).
they start to take away our rights and threaten to throw us in prison for
exercising them, we know it's time to get rid of these Far-Left fascist
organizations. They have no place in the Free World and are little
different from the kangaroo courts of the Non-Free World.
Fromm testifying at the Marc Lemire hearing:
KURZ: Fine. Going on. You also included near the end of in your posting,
talking about the tribunal system:
that's the protection the industry gives to one of their own in the
Soviet-style human rights tribunal kangaroo courts of
how you felt at that time about the human rights tribunals, correct?
FROMM: That's way I felt about that one, yes.
KURZ: And you still feel that way, correct?
FROMM: Still feel that way about that one.
v. Lemire Transcripts, Volume 19, Page 4328-4329
Warman testifying at the Marc Lemire hearing:
KULASZKA: He [BC Columnist Doug Collins] refers to human
rights tribunals as kangaroo courts. That's got nothing to do
with exposing anyone to hatred, does it?
WARMAN: I believe it shows a pattern of contempt for the laws that
Canadian citizens have laid down through Parliament in order to protect
KULASZKA: Isn't that the role of the press?
WARMAN: I'm sorry?
KULASZKA: Isn't that the role of the press, they are not supposed to be
obedient to the government or to simply praise them? Isn't that their
role, to question --
WARMAN: It's not my belief that holding open human rights' laws to
contempt and the laws that have been passed through Parliament is
necessarily automatically part of a free press, and certainly not in this
KULASZKA: But it's not a violation of section 13, correct?
WARMAN: Madam, really, I've answered the question.
v. Lemire Transcripts, Volume 6, Page 1183-1184
trying to ban Paul Fromm from representing Terry Tremaine: (And using the
fact Fromm referred to them as Kangaroo Courts to try to have him banned)
WARSAME: Mr. Fromm's prolific internet postings contain derisive
commentary directed at the Canadian judicial system, the Canadian Human
Rights Tribunal, the Canadian judges, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Members and the Commission.
Fromm has described the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal as "a Soviet
Fromm has referred to decisions of the Tribunal as "Stalinist
lunacy". That can be found in Exhibits "F" and
"K" of Mr. Warman's affidavit.
Fromm accused the Canadian courts and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
of being "increasingly corrupt". That can be found in Exhibit
"H" of Mr. Warman's affidavit.
Fromm feels that Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decisions in hate speech
v. Tremaine Transcripts, Volume 1, Page 15-16
WARSAME: It is our submission, Mr. Chair, that Mr. Fromm has clearly
manifested a blatant disrespect for the law. He has described the Tribunal
court". He make disparaging personal and professional remarks about
Fromm has described decisions of the Tribunal as "Stalinist
lunacy." The Commission, therefore, submits that it is clear from
comments made by Mr. Fromm that he views the Tribunal and the judicial
system as a whole with contempt.
v. Tremaine Transcripts, Volume 1, Page 26
right to free expression of opinion and belief -- though constrained in
its extremes during wartime -- is not something that can be negotiated in
a free country. For it is the most fundamental right -- the queen bee in
the hive, as it were. Every other freedom depends on this freedom. Take it
away, and we no longer have a free country.
Support Marc Lemire's Constitutional Challenge
Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law
and protect Freedom of Speech in