Interested in what is going on day to day in Canada?  Join the Freedom-Site Mailing Lists, or view the Online Archives Updates Daily!

 

 

 

 

Save Free Speech Now!

Mixed Agendas?

by Promajority

I wrote an article a little more than a year ago making the point that some anti-establishmentarians who claim to be fighting the likes of the Illuminati, the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and so on, sometimes mistakenly believe that they are actually fighting for the same cause, when in reality they sometimes have conflicting agendas. The article can be accessed by clicking below:

http://www.freedomsite.org/colum/promajority1.html

As I point out in the article, those within the pro-Majoritarian movement, including those who are on this mailing list, are fed up with the extent to which minority victimology (i.e. the Holocaust, slavery, the aboriginal question, the internship of the Japanese during WWII, the St. Louis Ship, etc.) dominates our culture. The rehashing of these and other alleged sins and the perpetual playing of both the genocide and race cards within our society is something to which pro-Majoritarian-types are firmly opposed.

Pro-Majoritarianism also overlaps with those fighting things such as abusive state power and unfair taxation. The point of the article, however, is that in some cases this commonality has its limitations. Here are some recent examples that have my blood boiling.

They involve a couple of staunch anti-establishmentarians fighting a couple of different battles. The first is Jean-Serge Brisson of Embrum (near Ottawa), Ontario, who has run in elections for the Canadian Libertarian Party. He's been fighting the seat belt law in the province of Ontario. He was involved in an accident in 1989 and only survived because he was thrown from his car. Had he been wearing a seatbelt he would have been crushed. He's launching a Constitutional challenge in an Ontario Court and these are the first two items in The Grounds of Application:

1. That the legislation, Highway Traffic Act of Ontario, is void ab initio, owing to her Majesty the Queen and the provincial government of Ontario being complicit in the crime of genocide as against the First Nations people, thereby depriving Her majesty the Queen and the provincial government of Ontario, the proper legislative authority to enact the Highway Traffic Act of Ontario.

2. That the Ontario government lacks proper legislative authority in Ontario, East Region, specifically the township of Russell, in that this territory is unceded Algonquin First Nations territory and the establishment of law courts and enforcement officers in this territory is directly contrary to the Royal Proclamation of 1763 set out in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms rendering the Highway Traffic Act of Ontario void as against the Appellant.

The first two items in The Constitutional Principles to be argued are:

1. The legislature of Ontario and Her Majesty the Queen, deprive themselves of legislative authority, by being complicit in the crime of genocide, contrary to their international treaty obligations codified in the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948.

2. By virtue of the relationship between Her Majesty the Queen and the legislature of Ontario, with the Algonquin First Nations people in this territory, there has been an unconstitutional assumption of court jurisdiction by provincial and federal courts, established in unceded Algonquin First Nations territory, and thereby amount to "Misprision of Treason and Fraud", within the meaning of the Royal Proclamation of 1763 encoded in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and amounts to "complicity in Genocide", contrary to the Convention of Genocide.

The other is an anti-establishmentarian named James Bradford Medd, who is part of the "de-tax" crowd. He's launching a Constitutional case to repeal the Income Tax Act. The first item on The Grounds for the Application Are:

1. That the legislation is void ab initio, owing to Her Majesty the Queen and the Federal government being complicit in the crime of genocide as against the First Nations people, thereby depriving Her majesty and the Federal Government of Canada the proper legislative authority to enact the Income Tax Act as against the Appellant.

The first item of The Constitutional Principles to be argued is:

1. The Parliament of Canada and Her Majesty the Queen, deprive themselves of legislative authority, by being complicit in the crime of genocide, contrary to their international treaty obligations codified in the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948. By virtue of the relationship between the parliament of Canada and Her Majesty the Queen, with the First Nations people of this land, there has been an unconstitutional assumption of court jurisdiction by provincial and federal courts, established in unceded First Nations territory, and thereby amount to "Misprision of Treason and Fraud", within the meaning of the Royal Proclamation of 1763, and amounts to "Complicity in Genocide" contrary to the Provisions of the said Convention on Genocide.

To me this is somewhat similar to O.J. Simpson playing the race card in his trial and is completely unacceptable. We as pro-Majoritarians are trying to get away from this race-card business and here we have two members of the white majority who fancy themselves as "system-busters" using the aboriginal genocide card. Is their next step to use The Holocaust card because Canada turned away the St. Louis Ship in 1939?

The point of the article I wrote and the point of this posting is to demonstrate that there can be a substantive difference in either the agendas or tactics between pro-Majoritarians and anti-establishmentarians. Please do not assume that everyone who opposes the System or who wants the Income Tax Act abolished is on the same page as we are when it comes to the race question.

Are you a Writer?  Submit you pieces to be included on the Controversial Columnists Page!  Just E-Mail it to webmaster@freedomsite.org 

 

The Freedom-Site has been online since 1996 and served over 10 Million Visitors

Your Donations = Our Survival
C.P.N., 152 Carlton Street, Suite 545, Toronto, Ontario, M5A 2K1, Canada
Please send what you can to help keep our website operational