1 - Freedom Fighters?
There's no such thing as a
Palestinian terrorist! If partisans in
Europe had a right to resist the Nazi
occupation of their lands, haven't
Palestinians an equal right to resist
Zionist occupation of theirs?
In Yitzakh Shamir's self-serving
autobiography, a chapter dealing with
the activities of his own terrorists is
titled _Freedom Fighters_. How can that
name be applied to foreign thugs who
killed scores of people in blowing up
the King David Hotel, who murdered 123
British police officers and a Swedish
peacekeeper, who tried to _make a pact
with Hitler_ to help him drive the
British out of Palestine? Those Eastern
European thugs were pushing into a
country which did not belong to them and
never had, wheras the Palestinians are
only trying to recover their own.
Anyone able to see through the fog of
Zionist propaganda must know which of
these two groups has a right to Shamir's
title.
2 - WHO STARTED THIS?
Amid all the viciously one-sided
propaganda today about "Palestinian
terrorists", has everyone forgotten
that these people have a perfect right
to resist the _illegal_ occupation of
their lands? U.N. Resolution 142 still
stands, calling upon Israel to end that
occupation. Every government in the Free
World - even the American, which under
Bush was less captive to the Jewish
Lobby than Clinton is - urged Shamir to
stop expanding Jewish settlements there.
Who hears anything about that today?
Instead, the U.S.A. is now supporting
Israel in turning back the clock to
those conditions which produced the
Intifada a decade ago!
How did this come about? Readers of
Viktor Ostrovsky's courageous expose of
the Mossad will already know the answer
- that Zionist hardliners hate the peace
process and will do anything to derail
it. Why else, when harnas has been quiet
for months, would Shin Bet choose to
stage their high-profile assassination
of "the Engineer"? Because
they knew that Hamas was bound to
retaliate. The rest follows. A _Globe
and Mail_ article confirms: "The
pause in bombings was to end the wake of
two dramatic assassinations of Islamic
terrorist leaders. Smiling Israeli
officials pointedly did not deny
responsibility."
Of course they were smiling! They've
got what they wanted. Who could blame
those formerly-moderate Palestinians who
now conclude that justice for their
people can come only through the
destruction of Israel?
3 - THE PRESS ON PALESTINE
An apologist for Israel writes to the
Calgary Herald that Palestinian conflict
is "based on the fact that Arabs
did not want to live with Jews."
That's not what leading Zionists have
said! Joseph Weitz, for example, heading
Jewish colonization in 1940:- "Between
ourselves, it must be clear that the
only solution is a Palestine without
arabs. Not one village, not one tribe
should be left." Can anyone
doubt that this remains the opinion of
Judeo-Nazis like Arel Sharon?
As for the Press in general, Zionists
all too often are allowed to lie their
heads off while those of us wanting to
tell the truth cannot get a word in!
What's particularly sickening is the
Zionists' endless promotion of "Jewish
anguish" over the Nazi
holocaust while never mentioning the
50-year anguish of the Palestinians.
When will those people realize that
they do not have the exclusive franchise
on suffering? |
